Export tax rebate is adjusted It is the moustache that tosses about
It is reported " after three year, the intersection of Ministry of Finance and the intersection of turndown and export tax rebate, the intersection of adjustment and direction and raise export tax rebate and completely contradict behind the financial crisis this time again. The notice of the Ministry of Finance of today, with the approval of the State Council, cancels some steel products, medicine, chemical products, nonferrous metals to process the export tax rebate of goods such as the material,etc. since July 15, the total number is up to 406 kinds. "
This a moustache gets one kind of policy down.
First, export tax rebate, just in order to make our products and enterprise in the fair play of the international market. It is not a favour especially offered to the export enterprise. Our enterprises, in the value-added tax which China paid, been returned, but it exports to Europe, pay the value-added tax in the locality. If the intersection of we and export tax rebate, export product to impose value-added tax twice. U.S.A. has not implemented the value-added tax, so there is certain friction with our country on this problem.
Second, according to the report extracted below, cancel the reason of some goods export tax rebate, it is probably two parts: 1,Adjust the industrial structure, these are cancelled the industry of export tax rebate, is not encouraged, rudimentary, low added value. 2,Main, it is a need of energy-conserving emission reduction. " eleven five " In the first four years of planning, China's energy intensity per unit GDP drops by 14.38% totally, this means dropping by more than 5.62% this year, could realize " Eleven five " Energy consumption drops the goals of 20% during this time. However, in first quarter of this year, national energy intensity per unit GDP did not lower rising instead, rose by 3.2%.
Third, finish energy-conserving emission reduction, it is the thing of giving an added grace to what is already beautiful, must not finish, especially can't disregard the cost to finish, otherwise shout and put the cart before the horse! Where is eleven five science of making 20% of the goals? Why must finish? Even if finish, it is not a good trick to reduce export tax rebate. 1993 educational planning outlines require the education expenditure to fight GDP4% in 2000, there are more than 2% results. The educational law requires, the education expenditure fights GDP proportion and rises year by year. N many province and city broke the law finally. Who does it hear because the intersection of education and expenditure reach, plan, require by requirement or law, and remember
Fourth, the method number value of energy-conserving emission reduction of American imperialism must be studied. First, impose the carbon dioxide tax. In this way, can make enterprises destroy biochemistry in the cost of the environment through price mechanism, thus reach optimum level of pollution, optimum level of pollution instead of free from contamination! Second, stipulate a quantity of carbon discharge for each enterprise. Exceed this quantity, does not allow. The second measure, expedite the emergence of a very large carbon discharge trade market. I am a high-efficiency enterprise, carbon discharge quotas that you give to me are not enough, I buy this quota from other enterprises. Expert of U.S.A. which is good and which is bad, strike violently for dispute these two methods.
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment